Much ado about the BHA rating of 85 at Best hearing
Trainer Jim Best: asked who else the BHA counsel might be implicating
PICTURE: Getty Images Much ado about the BHA rating of 85 at Best hearing By Bruce Jackson 6:32PM 24 NOV 2016
THE BHA hearing into two horses trained by Jim Best being allegedly stopped in races last year momentarily looked like taking on extra runners and riders at the London rehearing on Thursday.
Best, found guilty at the original hearing in February but whose four-year ban was quashed on appeal, raised concerns the BHA was trying to implicate Jamie Moore and Mattie Batchelor in stopping rides on another of his horses.
BHA counsel Louis Weston QC raised the case of Planetoid, who joined Best to go jumping with a similar Flat rating to Echo Brava.
The BHA's whistleblower, rider Paul John, had given evidence that Best had told him to stop Echo Brava at Plumpton and Missile Man at Towcester three days apart last December.
In that statement, John told of a conversation with Best about Echo Brava needing a jumps rating that matched his Flat mark of 85 in order to win over hurdles.
'A clear advantage'
Follow Us on TwitterFollow @RacingValueUK
Weston said: "When Planetoid had got a handicap of 85 after six races over jumps, Mr [Anthony] McCoy was jocked up after Mattie Batchelor's car broke down. McCoy won on him twice before, off a mark of 108, he finished third – a clear advantage of a horse having a mark of 85."
Best, calling all John's evidence about stopping-ride conversations "untrue, lies and not true", asked the BHA legal counsel if he was implicating Moore and Batchelor.
The trainer said: "It feels like you're suggesting that this horse was purposefully not run on its merits to get 85 . . . if this is your case you are suggesting Jamie Moore and Mattie Batchelor were basically riding stopping rides."
It was Best's lawyer, Jonathan Laidlaw QC, who stepped in to put that fire out, saying: "This is an unattractive way to be conducting the case, with two rides under consideration in this case."
Panel takes fresh line
There was another unexpected deviation when a completely new avenue of investigation was undertaken by panel member William Norris QC, a former amateur rider in the 1980s.
He painted a picture of a reason why a jockey might ride a stopping race on a short-priced runner "on behalf of a gambler or bookmaker who has laid it to lose".
Pointing out that was unlikely to have been the case with Echo Brava (22-1 from 33-1) and Missile Man (14-1), who were not short-priced, he asked whether it might be "to create an artificially lower handicap mark, which is known to happen in racing," adding: "Would that be done on behalf of anyone but the owner and trainer or both?"
Jack Callaghan, joint-owner of Missile Man and seven others in Best's stable, was indignant there was a suggestion his horse had been stopped and that he was in any way party to such a plot.
"I'm horrified by the suggestion," he said. "I'm not short of money and there is no reason why I would be involved with that motive. Beyond comprehension, it's nonsensical, as the horse was worth slightly more than I paid for it [35,000gns]."
Last day schedule of events
Thursday was a truncated day as Weston had to fly to Ireland after lunch. The hearing is scheduled to finish on Friday, when events are set to include a phone call with Jamie Moore, an appearance by Best's head lad Paul Cooley, more documentary evidence and extensive closing arguments from both lawyers.
The panel announced it would not be reaching a verdict until next week.
Leave us a comment!
Share this story:
Subscribe to our Newsletter today to receive Free Horse Racing Tips.
Simply fill out the form below and wait for the Free Tips to land in your inbox.